SynthesisBMC public health2025
Factors for adherence to a physical activity promotion program in the workplace: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three group randomised controlled trial on effectiveness of mobile application based performance feedback interventions on cardiovascular risk factors among Nigerian university staff.Discover public health · 2026Article
- Analysis of the characteristics and differences in exercise participation among seven occupational categories of female workers in China-a cross-sectional survey of 31 provinces across the country.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- MIAuSport: a feasibility and acceptability study of a workplace-based physical activity program for hospital healthcare workers.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe health benefits of physical activity (PA) are now widely accepted and proven. Promoting PA in the workplace is therefore of major public health interest, but is limited by employees' adherence.
methodA systematic review was therefore carried out to identify factors for adherence to PA promotion program in the workplace (primary outcome); health outcomes were to be regarded as secondary outcomes. Four databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane CRCTs) and PsycInfo were searched to find all pertinent articles published from 2000 until June 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical trials were selected.
resultsMore than 9000 publications were analyzed and 91 were retrieved. Two main types of study were identified: 46 non-supervised PA programs (NSPAPs) supported by socio-cognitive theories, and 45 supervised (tailored) programs (SPAPs). Concerning the primary outcome, the main factors identified for adherence were the levels of baseline PA, health and motivation of the individual; intervention individualization at the interventional level; and work environment quality at the organizational level. This review highlighted significant health benefits in both types of study, with effect sizes ranging from small to large. DISCUSSION: Assessing these factors for adherence emerges as an essential prerequisite before implementing a PA promotion program in the workplace. According to our results, implementing NSPAPs, supported by socio-cognitive theories, is rather complex, and such programs can be difficult to operationalize in their entirety; consequently, coach-supervised PAPs based on RCT programs tend to be more effective.
conclusionOur results prove the short and medium-term beneficial effect on health of PAP in the workplace based on rigorous methodology such as RCTs. Management's support through work organization and the follow-up of actions in the long term are an essential factor for adherence to these programs. Finally, we suggest what this literature review contributes for future research or entrepreneurial and/or political projects. In fine, new models of working time will have to be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.