ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Antibiotic adherence and treatment completion associated with partial oral therapy versus all intravenous therapy in patients with serious Staphylococcus aureus infections.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel use of oral delafloxacin monotherapy in staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis: A case report.Infectious medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPartial oral antibiotic therapy is a safe and effective alternative to all intravenous (IV) therapy for serious Staphylococcus aureus infections; however, antibiotic adherence and treatment completion rates associated with partial oral therapy outside of clinical trials are unknown.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of adults hospitalized with S. aureus bacteremia, endocarditis, or bone or joint infection. Co-primary outcomes of antibiotic adherence and treatment completion were compared between patients who transitioned to oral antibiotics during treatment or received all IV therapy. Factors associated with lack of treatment completion were evaluated by logistic regression.
resultsOf 249 patients, 148 (59%) and 101 (41%) were treated with partial oral or all IV therapy, respectively. Use of partial oral therapy was more common for bone or joint (73% of cases) than bloodstream infections (21% of cases). Antibiotic adherence was similar between the partial oral and all IV groups; 90% and 98% of patients completed the planned course, respectively (p = 0.38). By logistic regression, partial oral therapy was independently associated with lack of treatment completion (odds ratio 4.53 [95%CI 1.0-20.6]). Clinical failure occurred in 26% and 25% of patients who received partial oral and all IV therapy, respectively (p = 0.87).
conclusionsIn clinical practice, a high proportion of patients treated with partial oral therapy for serious S. aureus infections completed treatment, but partial oral therapy was an independent risk factor for failure to complete treatment. These findings highlight the importance of identifying and addressing barriers to adherence when considering oral therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.