ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
Designing a Multi-Stakeholder Intervention for Return to Work After Burnout. A Participatory Approach.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attrition of the Midwifery Workforce: Understanding Factors Associated With Leaving the Profession.Health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBurnout is a leading cause of prolonged sick leave and workforce withdrawal, with high relapse rates after return to work (RTW). Despite its classification as an occupational phenomenon, RTW interventions for burnout to date predominantly focus on individual recovery, often neglecting workplace-directed strategies. This study aimed to develop a multi-stakeholder RTW intervention, integrating both individual and organizational components through a participatory, iterative design process.
methodsUsing a Design Thinking approach structured within the Double Diamond framework, this study employed a co-creation methodology to engage employees, supervisors, HR professionals, occupational health practitioners, and other RTW experts in the development of a comprehensive RTW intervention. The process unfolded through iterative cycles of stakeholder engagement, prototyping, and refinement. Formative usability testing was conducted to assess feasibility, practicality, and alignment with workplace needs.
resultsThe intervention included three key components: (1) a neutral RTW facilitator role and corresponding training program for facilitators supporting employees and supervisors; (2) a structured step-by-step RTW process with distinct pre- and post-RTW phases; and (3) a supporting toolbox incorporating conversation cards and a digital tool for progress monitoring.
conclusionThis study highlights the feasibility of a multi-stakeholder, design-driven approach to RTW intervention development. By aligning the intervention with real-world needs through participatory design, the intervention holds the promise for reducing relapse and supporting sustainable RTW. Future research should evaluate its effectiveness in real-world implementation and its impact on long-term work retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40382527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.