Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40382506›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2025

The cross-sectional relationship of physical frailty and cognitive impairment in older Poles: analysis of the PolSenior2 data.

Anna Skalska, Karolina Piotrowicz, Hanna Kujawska-Danecka, Kacper Jagiełło, Alicja Klich Rączka, Małgorzata Mossakowska, Tomasz Zdrojewski, Tomasz Grodzicki, Jerzy Gąsowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna Skalska *Department of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Karolina Piotrowicz *Department of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Hanna Kujawska-DaneckaDepartment of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Medical Univeristy of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Kacper JagiełłoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Education, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Alicja Klich RączkaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Małgorzata MossakowskaStudy on Aging and Longevity, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz ZdrojewskiDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Education, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Tomasz GrodzickiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Jerzy GąsowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland. jerzy.gasowski@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-5323

Funding

Ministerstwo Zdrowia 6/5/4.2/NPZ/2017/1203/1257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the relation between pre-frailty and frailty, and its components on one hand and the presence, degree and components of cognitive impairment.

methodsThis is a nationwide epidemiologic survey of health determinants in older Poles (PolSenior2). We assessed physical frailty using the approach by Fried et al. and cognitive impairment with the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE). We calculated population estimates (95% CI) of conditions under study, with sampling weights to account for the complex survey design, with the age-sex post-stratification matching to the population of Poland. We used logistic regression to model cognitive impairment as function of frailty phenotype.

resultsMean (SD) age of 5378 participants (58.0% women) was 75.0 (9.4) years. Frailty was diagnosed in 23.5% of respondents, and 54.6% were pre-frail. Normal cognition was found in 51.3%, 23.0% had suspected mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and suspected: 16.3% mild, 6.5% moderate and 2.9% severe dementia. Robust phenotype was present in 35.7% normal cognition persons, 4.7% in moderate dementia, and 0.0% in severe dementia. Frailty increased from 9.2% in normal cognition to 57.4% and 85.3% in moderate dementia and severe dementia. Frailty component that was associated with abnormalities in all MMSE domains was exhaustion. In the presence of exhaustion, the best-preserved function was registration, and the most pronounced was attention deficit.

conclusionFrailty and cognitive impairment are closely associated. While exhaustion was standing out among the frailty components, it was associated with impaired orientation and attention deficits. These data may inform both the prevention and rehabilitation and nutritional counseling.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaFrail ElderlyFrailtyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsPolandCognitive impairmentFrailty componentsOlder adultsPhysical frailty

Identifiers

PMID40382506
PMCPMC12378653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.