Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40382483›Full record

SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

MRI-based radiomics for differentiating high-grade from low-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nima Broomand Lomer, Amirhosein Ghasemi, Amir Mahmoud Ahmadzadeh, Drew A Torigian

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nima Broomand LomerMedical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
Amirhosein GhasemiFaculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Amir Mahmoud AhmadzadehDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Drew A TorigianDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States. Drew.Torigian@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigh-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is linked to lower survival rates and more aggressive disease progression. This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of MRI-derived radiomics as a non-invasive approach for pre-operative differentiation of high-grade from low-grade ccRCC.

methodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 and METRICS. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were estimated using a bivariate model. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for radiomics models and combined models, where the latter integrated clinical and radiological features with radiomics. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify potential outliers.

resultsA total of 15 studies comprising 2,265 patients were included, with seven and six studies contributing to the meta-analysis of radiomics and combined models, respectively. The pooled estimates of the radiomics model were as follows: sensitivity, 0.78; specificity, 0.84; PLR, 4.17; NLR, 0.28; DOR, 17.34; and AUC, 0.84. For the combined model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.87, 0.81, 3.78, 0.21, 28.57, and 0.90, respectively. Radiomics models trained on smaller cohorts exhibited a significantly higher pooled specificity and PLR than those trained on larger cohorts. Also, radiomics models based on single-user segmentation demonstrated a significantly higher pooled specificity compared to multi-user segmentation.

conclusionRadiomics has demonstrated potential as a non-invasive tool for grading ccRCC, with combined models achieving superior performance.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiomicsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansNeoplasm GradingSensitivity and SpecificityClear cell renal cell carcinomaMachine learningNeoplasm gradingRadiomicsTexture analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.