ArticleCurrent microbiology2025
Bioremediation Performance of Recombinant Shewanella azerbaijanica; Considering Uranium Removal in the Presence of Nitrate.
Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heterotrophic bacterial bioleaching and sequestration of uranium from mineral resources: a review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic engineering in microorganisms has emerged as a promising approach for pollutant removal from industrial wastewater. Shewanella azerbaijanica has the ability to reduce uranium. This study examined the impact of high-nitrate concentrations on uranium bioreduction in both native and recombinant bacterial strains. Bacterial performance was evaluated in terms of uranium bioreduction (measured via ICP-AES method), and survival in anaerobic conditions (measured via Neubauer chamber counting) in the presence of uranium and nitrate over various time intervals (24 h, 1 week, 4 weeks, 4 months, and 9 months). Although the recombinant strain showed a lower cell population than the wild-type strain, it achieved 20% higher uranium reduction after 24 h of incubation in uranium and nitrate-containing conditions. This suggests that the genetic modifications enhanced extracellular electron transfer (EET). The improved bioremediation efficiency may be attributed to the cloned mtrC gene, which promotes more effective electron transfer in Shewanella bacteria. Additionally, uranium removal may have been further enhancedby the inactivation of the napB gene using the SDM method. This high-performance trends was consistent across all time intervals. In wild-type S. azerbaijanica uranium removal rates were74%, 54%, 96 and 99% after 1 week, 4 weeks, 4 months, and 9 months, respectively. Inrecombinant bacteria, these rates increased to 91%, 78%, 96%, and 100% at the same time points. The bioreduction mechanism was further confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, which verified the ability of S. azerbaijanica to reduce uranium in the presence of nitrate. Overall, this study identifies the recombinant bacterium as promising candidate for future metal bioreduction research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40382480What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.