ArticleScientific reports2025
Home self monitoring of blood glucose using a glucometer and its determinants among diabetes mellitus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance and Safety of a 15-Day Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Adults With Diabetes: A Multicenter Trial.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026Article
- Technology in Diabetes: A Year in Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Review
- Practices for glucose measurement with a glucometer in a population of diabetic patients. An observational study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Determinants of self-monitoring adherence in type 2 diabetes: bridging the gap in patient care.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Home self-monitoring of blood glucose is when a patient checks their own blood glucose levels using a glucose meter. It is an appropriate way to treat and prevent acute complications of diabetes mellitus. However, there is little study found in the study area. Therefore, this finding aimed to assess home self-monitoring of blood glucose using a glucometer and its socio-demographic factors that will provide feedback for health professionals as well as for patients to intervene early. An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was conducted at DTCSH from March 1 to 30, 2024. A total of 226 respondents were included in this study. The systematic random sampling technique was employed for selected study participants, and data was collected using pre-tested and semi-structured questionnaires. We used SPSS version 20 software for data analysis. Statistical significance for possible associated factors was tested using a p-value < 0.05 and CI 95%. From this finding, only 37.2% of study participants had self-monitoring of blood glucose using a glucometer at home. From the study, 32.4% had good knowledge, and 32.6% had good practice regarding home self-monitoring of blood glucose. Ownership of glucometers (AOR = 4.76 (2.27-9.9)), getting advice (AOR = 2.46; 95% CI (1.64-6.74)), educational level (AOR = 3.75; 95% CI (2.32-7.89)), and residence (AOR = 1.6; 95% CI (1.44-2.6)) were determinants of home self-monitoring of blood glucose using a glucometer. The finding showed only less than half of the study participants had home self-monitoring of blood glucose using a glucometer. Ownership of glucometers, getting advice on self-blood glucose monitoring, educational level, and residency were determinant factors of home self-monitoring blood glucose. Therefore, the health care providers should increase the awareness of diabetic patients on home self-monitoring of blood glucose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.