Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40382436›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Sentiment analysis using long short term memory and amended dwarf mongoose optimization algorithm.

Haisheng Deng, Ahmed Alkhayyat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haisheng DengXijing University, Xi'an, 710123, Shaanxi, China.
Ahmed AlkhayyatCollege of Technical Engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq. alkhayyatahmed45@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of machine learning to analyze sentiments has attained considerable interest in the past few years. The task of analyzing sentiments has becfigome increasingly important and challenging. Due to the specific attributes of this type of data, including length of text, spelling errors, and abbreviations, unconventional methods and multiple steps are required for effectively analyzing sentiment in such a complex environment. In this research, two distinct word embedding models, GloVe and Word2Vec, were utilized for vectorization. To enhance the performance long short-term memory (LSTM), the model was optimized using the amended dwarf mongoose optimization (ADMO) algorithm, leading to improvements in the hyperparameters. The LSTM-ADMO achieved the accuracy values of 97.74 and 97.47 using Word2Vec and GloVe, respectively on IMDB, and it could gain the accuracy values of 97.84 and 97.51 using Word2Vec and GloVe, respectively on SST-2. In general, it was determined that the proposed model significantly outperformed other models, and there was very little difference between the two different word embedding techniques.

Indexed as

Amended dwarf mongoose optimization (ADMO) algorithmGloVeLong short-term memory (LSTM)Sentiment analysisWord2Vec

Identifiers

PMID40382436
PMCPMC12085641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.