ArticleScientific reports2025
The association between enema and nervous system injury in Diquat poisoning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combined predictive value of dose, MODS, and NLR for lethal risk of diquat poisoning: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate whether enema is associated with nervous system injury caused by diquat poisoning using a population-based case-control analysis. Medical records of patients with acute diquat poisoning admitted to the hospital from January 2018 to January 2024 were retrospectively collected. Central nervous system injury symptoms following diquat poisoning defined the case group, while the control group were matched 1:2 on population-based without nervous system injury in diquat poisoning patients. Conditional logistic regression models were used for analysis. We identified 101 diquat poisoning patients with nervous system injury and selected 202 diquat poisoning patients without nervous system injury. Diquat poisoning patients performed 2 and ≧ 3 enemas had ORs of nervous system injury of 3.084 (95% CI 1.230, 7.734) and 4.693 (95% CI 1.408, 15.645) compared with diquat poisoning patients with no enema, respectively. Further analyses were performed in various age subgroups. The ORs of conducting 2 and ≧ 3 enemas were dramatically higher among case group than control group in subgroup aged ≧ 60 years old (OR 10.184, 14.982 respectively). We concluded that enema may be associated with an increased risk of nervous system injury caused by DQ poisoning, particularly among the elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.