ArticleScientific reports2025
Novel insight into the spatiotemporal distribution of Greenland ice sheet surface densities from eleven years of satellite radar altimetry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Greenland Ice Sheet near-surface density is a key parameter as it facilitates converting changes in volume from repeat satellite altimetry to changes in mass. However, the need to continually quantify density through both space and time means it is conventionally derived using numerical models. Recently, new focus is being placed on directly deriving ice sheet surface properties from satellite observations. Here we show how 11 years of surface densities derived from ESA CryoSat-2 and CNES/ISRO SARAL radar altimetry compare against in situ and regional climate model results. We find that a consistent interpretation of the satellite near-surface densities is strongly modulated by the presence of melt. For periods when the ice sheet surface can be considered frozen, satellite-based densities best represent in situ conditions at different intervals in the top 1.25 m. At the same time, while long-term pan-Greenland observation- and model-based mean densities are similar, the observations reveal spatial patterns absent in the models and consistently greater densities in the ice sheet interior. In months with strong melting, the satellite results return anomalously low surface densities, though accounting for associated changes in radar backscattering phenomena and stratigraphic interpretation are limited by the lack of contemporaneous in situ data. Overall, we establish a quantitative approach for interpreting novel densities derived exclusively from satellite observations and present a comparison to state-of-the-art model results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.