ArticleScientific reports2025
An integrated deep learning model for early and multi-class diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease from MRI scans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based cognitive impairment brain imaging analysis: New methods, new technologies, and new paradigms.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Applying ensemble machine learning techniques to MRI scans to predict Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An Explainable Multi-Scale Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Class Brain MRI Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable Patient-Level Cognitive Impairment Screening via Temporal, Semantic, and Psycholinguistic Multimodal AI.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- NeuroFM: Toward Precision Neuroimaging with Foundation Models for Individualized Brain Health Estimation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- FUSION-AD: interpretable AI framework for risk assessment and subgroup discovery in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that severely affects memory, behavior, and cognitive function. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective intervention, yet detecting subtle changes in the early stages remains a challenge. In this study, we propose a hybrid deep learning-based multi-class classification system for AD using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The proposed approach integrates an improved DeepLabV3+ (IDeepLabV3+) model for lesion segmentation, followed by feature extraction using the LeNet-5 model. A novel feature selection method based on average correlation and error probability is employed to enhance classification efficiency. Finally, an Enhanced ResNext (EResNext) model is used to classify AD into four stages: non-dementia (ND), very mild dementia (VMD), mild dementia (MD), and moderate dementia (MOD). The proposed model achieves an accuracy of 98.12%, demonstrating its superior performance over existing methods. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) further validates its effectiveness, with the highest score of 0.97 for moderate dementia. This study highlights the potential of hybrid deep learning models in improving early AD detection and staging, contributing to more accurate clinical diagnosis and better patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.