ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of mask R-CNN and YOLOv8-seg for improved monitoring of the PCB surface during laser cleaning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Potting compounds and coatings protect electronic components in harsh environments, requiring careful removal for recycling or repair. This study introduces the innovative use of YOLOv8-seg and Mask R-CNN to enhance the precision and efficiency of the laser cleaning process for PCBs (Printed Circuit Boards). These models are utilized for two primary tasks: real-time segmentation for laser cleaning guidance and post-cleaning surface quality assessment. Real-time segmentation adapts cleaning strategies based on PCB surface states such as 'Bare-Cu', 'Complete-Removal', 'Incomplete-Removal', etc. Quality assessment ensures high-quality, damage-free surfaces post-cleaning. Both models were trained on an augmented dataset to improve robustness. In the initial test dataset, YOLOv8-seg (l), known for its speed, achieved an mAP50 (seg) of 82.8% at 3.98 FPS, proving suitable for time-sensitive laser cleaning processes due to its speed and precision. Mask R-CNN (ResNet-50) reached an mAP50 (seg) of 84.097% at 1.52 FPS, fulfilling real-time requirements with high precision. Although their visualization segmentation results on the initial test dataset vary, both models successfully address the previously mentioned tasks. When tested on a new dataset with unseen patterns it was shown that YOLOv8-seg excels at generalizing to new patterns while Mask R-CNN performs less effectively. This study confirms YOLOv8-seg's effectiveness in real-time PCB monitoring during laser cleaning, boosting automation and efficiency in PCB recycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.