ArticleScientific reports2025
A mutual mapping model of cross-sections between the axial and normal planes of ball screws based on the forming of helical ball track.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a novel axial-normal plane mutual interconversion algorithm for ball screws, which effectively bridges the gap between design and actual product. It is pivotal in streamlining processes across the design, manufacturing, and inspection phases of ball screws. By forming the ball track, the mutual mapping matrix between the axial and normal planes addresses key challenges and enhances engineering applications has been developed. The method simplifies the complex interaction within ball screws, offering a comprehensive model for better understanding and application. Empirical evaluations demonstrate the efficiency and precision of our algorithm. In 3D modeling tests, it processes 10,000 points in merely 5 ms, with an impressively low maximum relative error of 0.001%. Further testing in product detection confirms the robustness of the model, maintaining a maximum relative error under 0.5%. This high precision and efficiency underscore the algorithm's value in enhancing design, manufacturing, and inspection processes. Overall, our research offers significant practical engineering benefits, thereby advancing ball screw technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.