Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40382371›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Near real-time online reinforcement learning with synchronous or asynchronous updates.

Mircea-Bogdan Radac, Darius-Pavel Chirla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mircea-Bogdan RadacDepartment of Automation and Applied Informatics, Politehnica University of Timisoara, Bvd. V. Parvan, 2, 300223, Timisoara, Romania. mircea.radac@upt.ro.
Darius-Pavel Chirla, Timisoara, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7146-431X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a well-known method for learning control of complex and unknown dynamical systems. In this paper, we propose a solution for addressing a major limitation of the existing RL schemes when it comes to interleaving the environment interaction step with the learning step. Leveraging the neural network approximation complexity with the real-time learning capability is one of several reasons for which RL has not been adopted more in practical control systems. Our online learning solution with near real-time capability is piloted by a model-reference tracking control problem where the underlying system state is encoded as a moving window of past output and input signals expanded with the reference model state and with the reference input state. The value function and the controller neural networks are trained online using the rules of backpropagation, based on the interaction experiences with the system. Two case studies, a simulation one and an experimental one involving a real hardware, show that the proposed methodology is valid. We compare learning performance operation times under two popular, high-level software packages with automatic differentiation capabilities, under both synchronous and asynchronous updates. The software challenges are discussed in detail based on code runtime numbers, concluding that for lower order systems with relative fast dynamics and adaptive characteristics, there is a strong incentive to further develop online synchronous RL that are closer to the real-time requirements. While the asynchronous online RL motivates scaling up the learning method to higher dimensional systems with faster dynamics, even in non hard real-time setups.

Indexed as

Learning systemNeural networksOnline learningReal-timeReinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID40382371
PMCPMC12085598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.