Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40382368›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

ConsensuSV-ONT - A modern method for accurate structural variant calling.

Antoni Pietryga, Mateusz Chiliński, Sachin Gadakh, Dariusz Plewczynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Research evolution of flat peach (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antoni PietrygaLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz ChilińskiLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Sachin GadakhLaboratory of Functional and Structural Genomics, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Dariusz PlewczynskiLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland. Dariusz.Plewczynski@pw.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvements in sequencing technology make the development of new tools for detection of structural variance more and more common. However, since the tools available for the long-read Oxford Nanopore sequencing are limited, and the selection of the optimal tool presents a challenge, there is a need to create a tool based on Consensus that combines existing work to identify a set of high-quality, reliable structural variants that can be used for further downstream analysis. The field has also been subject to revolution in machine learning techniques, especially deep learning. To address the aforementioned need and developments, we propose a novel, fully automated ConsensuSV-ONT algorithm. The method uses six independent, state-of-the-art structural variant callers for long-read sequencing along with a convolutional neural network for filtering high-quality variants. We provide a runtime environment in the form of a docker image, wrapping a nextflow pipeline for efficient processing using parallel computing. The solution is complete in its form and is ready to use not only by computer scientists but accessible and easy to use for everyone working with Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing data.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNanopore SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSoftware

Identifiers

PMID40382368
PMCPMC12085603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.