ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning based adaptive traffic prediction and control using edge impulse platform.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Concrete to Code: A Survey of AI-Driven Transportation Infrastructure, Security, and Human Interaction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A multi-scenario evaluation of adaptive Fuzzy Logic Algorithms for intelligent traffic signal management in Urban intersections.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Edge-AI Enabled Acoustic Monitoring and Spatial Localisation for Sow Oestrus Detection.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Machine learning driven aggregation aware bitmap MAC protocol for energy efficient data transmission in WSNs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing Urban Traffic Efficiency and Safety via V2X: A Simulation Study Using the MOSAIC Platform.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traffic congestion and delays are two major challenges in modern vehicle traffic control systems. These issues can be mitigated through an efficient and autonomous traffic scheduling system. The objective of the proposed methodology is to automate the traffic control system based on the density of vehicles approaching to the traffic signal without any human intervention. Unlike the conventional traffic signal systems that rely on preset timers which is often unsuitable for unpredictable traffic conditions. Therefore, the proposed approach dynamically adjusts signal timings based on real-time data. The methodology utilizes proximity sensors strategically placed at a predetermined distance from the traffic signal to detect approaching vehicles. The speed and density of vehicles are monitored based on the readings from these sensors. A Edge-Impulse-based machine learning model is proposed to predict the density and arrival time of the vehicles to the traffic signal. Using machine learning algorithms, the system can forecast future traffic conditions and optimize real-time traffic control by significantly reducing congestion and delays. Moreover, by automating the traffic scheduling process, the proposed methodology can help to reduce human error and improve the safety of road users. The proposed methodology has the potential to transform existing traffic control systems, making them more intelligent, efficient, and autonomous. The model is rigorously tested and validated to ensure its reliability and accuracy in real-world traffic scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.