ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2025
Leveraging RNA from DNA Extraction Lysate to Rescue "Insufficient" Samples for More Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Patients with Scant Tumor Specimens.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue availability is often a limiting factor in obtaining comprehensive genomic profiling to identify actionable oncogenic drivers in tumors from patients with cancer. The utility of performing complementary DNA and RNA sequencing to better identify targetable gene fusions was previously reported. Here, we report our experience using RNA recovered from lysate material, following DNA extraction, to perform targeted RNA sequencing and identify gene fusions and oncogenic transcript variants in a large cohort of patients with solid tumors. To validate this approach, RNA-sequencing results of lysate-extracted RNA and direct formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) extracted RNA from the same tumors were compared. After finding equivalent identification of oncogenic gene fusions and transcript variants, efforts were expanded to a larger cohort across more diverse tumor types. Lysate-extracted RNA performed comparably to freshly FFPE extract RNA, with 97% and 96% success rates, respectively. Within the lysate-extracted group, it was documented that lysate was the only material available for RNA extraction (n = 1862, 42% of all tested samples) and, within this subgroup, 364 (20%) samples were positive for actionable fusions or oncogenic isoforms. Using RNA recovered from lysate can permit sequential or simultaneous comprehensive DNA/RNA sequencing from scant FFPE samples in laboratories where dual sample extraction is not logistically possible, allowing more complete profiling to enhance the identification of actionable oncogenic gene fusions to guide care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.