ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025
Biomedical text normalization through generative modeling.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of Human-AI Collaborative Workflow in SNOMED CT Mapping of Bilingual Clinical Text.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- A data-driven method for research trend analysis in a scientific discipline: Application to the journal of biomedical informatics.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026Article
- Leveraging Large Language Models in Extracting Drug Safety Information from Prescription Drug Labels.Drug safety · 2026Article
- Improving biomedical entity linking with generative relevance feedback.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA large proportion of electronic health record (EHR) data consists of unstructured medical language text. The formatting of this text is often flexible and inconsistent, making it challenging to use for predictive modeling, clinical decision support, and data mining. Large language models' (LLMs) ability to understand context and semantic variations makes them promising tools for standardizing medical text. In this study, we develop and assess clinical text normalization pipelines built using large-language models.
methodsWe implemented four LLM-based normalization strategies (Zero-Shot Recall, Prompt Recall, Semantic Search, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation based normalization [RAGnorm]) and one baseline approach using TF-IDF based String Matching. We evaluated performance across three datasets of SNOMED-mapped condition terms: [1] an oncology-specific dataset, [2] a representative sample of institutional medical conditions, and [3] a dataset of commonly occurring condition codes (>1000 uses) from our institution. We measured performance by recording the mean shortest path length between predicted and true SNOMED CT terms. Additionally, we benchmarked our models against the TAC 2017 drug label annotations, which normalizes terms to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Preferred Terms.
resultsWe found that RAGnorm was the most effective throughout each dataset, achieving a mean shortest path length of 0.21 for the domain-specific dataset, 0.58 for the sampled dataset, and 0.90 for the top terms dataset. It achieved a micro F1 score of 88.01 on task 4 of the TAC2017 conference, surpassing all other models without viewing the provided training data.
conclusionWe find that retrieval-focused approaches overcome traditional LLM limitations for this task. RAGnorm and related retrieval techniques should be explored further for the normalization of biomedical free text.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.