Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40381687›Full record

ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage2025

How aging causes osteoarthritis: An evolutionary physiology perspective.

David Gems

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Epigenetic clocks and programmatic aging.Ageing research reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David GemsInstitute of Healthy Ageing, and Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK. Electronic address: david.gems@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 215574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Late-life diseases result from the poorly understood process of senescence (aging), which is largely genetically determined. According to a recently proposed evolutionary physiology-based account, the multifactorial model, senescence is largely caused by evolved but non-adaptive programmatic mechanisms specified by the wild-type (i.e. normal) genome. These act together with disruptions to wild-type function (due e.g. to infectious pathogens, mechanical injury and malnutrition) in a variety of combinations to generate diverse late-life diseases. Here, I explore the utility of this model by testing its capacity to provide an account of one complex, late-life disease, osteoarthritis (OA), and suggest a framework for understanding OA etiology. In this cartilage-focused framework, a core OA disease mechanism is a futile (non-adaptive) developmental program of endochondral ossification, in which hypertrophic articular cartilage chondrocytes alter joint architecture. Programmatic changes prime chondrocytes for futile program activation, which can be triggered by secondary causes of OA (e.g. joint mechanical injury). I suggest that an evolutionary cause of this priming, involving antagonistic pleiotropy, is selection to maximize early-life tissue repair benefits at the expense of late-life programmatic costs.

Indexed as

AgingBiological EvolutionOsteoarthritisAnimalsCartilage, ArticularChondrocytesHumansAntagonistic pleiotropyChondrocyteEvolutionary medicineHyperfunctionOsteoarthritisProgrammatic theory

Identifiers

PMID40381687
PMCPMC7618562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.