Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40381316›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2025

Computing lifetime incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma and age-specific prevalence of Barrett's esophagus.

Ravi Vissapragada, Norma B Bulamu, David C Whiteman, Tim Bright, Jonathan Karnon, David I Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of a diagnosis of 'low-grade dysplasia' in patients with Barrett's esophagus.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Article
  3. Pathogenesis of Barrett's Esophagus: Evolving and Emerging Mechanisms.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ravi VissapragadaDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Norma B BulamuDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
David C WhitemanPopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Tim BrightDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Jonathan KarnonFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
David I WatsonDiscipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barrett's esophagus is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Esophageal adenocarcinoma detected from endoscopic surveillance programs accounts for <10% of all cases, suggesting majority of patients with Barrett's esophagus are likely unaccounted for. Previous observational studies have estimated the observed prevalence of Barrett's esophagus to be approximately 1%, but others suggest may be an underestimate. The aim of this study was twofold: (i) calculate lifetime risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and (ii) estimate overall and age-specific prevalence of Barrett's esophagus. A tree cohort model was created for progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma from birth to death (100 years) for USA and Australian population. Lifetime risk of esophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma were necessary for calculating Barrett's esophagus prevalence. The model incorporated age- and sex-specific incidence data from national cancer registries: the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for the USA. The model was calibrated using an optimization algorithm, which matched progression rates from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma with known national cancer data. A Monte Carlo simulation, with 10,000 iterations, was conducted to derive error margins. Estimates of age-specific and overall prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the population were generated through a similar process. Results: The lifetime risk of esophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma in USA non-Hispanic White population was 0.56% and 0.36%, respectively, while it was somewhat higher at 0.81% and 0.61% (range 0.57%-0.65%) in the Australian population. Estimated overall prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was ~3% (±0.3%) and ~ 5.4% (±0.6%) in USA White and Australian populations (male and female). Prevalence for age brackets was estimated at 0.06% (±0.02%), 1.6% (±0.7%), 3.2% (±1.3%), 8% (±3%), and 12% (±4%) for USA, and 0.05% (±0.02%), 0.9% (±0.5%), 2.8% (±1.2%), 7% (±3%), and 12% (±4%) for Australian population for ages 0-29, 30-44, 45-59, 60-74, and 75+, respectively. Observed estimates of Barrett's esophagus prevalence are likely lower than projected overall prevalence. This study also presents age-specific prevalence estimates of Barrett's esophagus, which are key in developing screening programs for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAge FactorsAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIncidenceBarrett’s esophagusesophageal adenocarcinomalifetime riskprevalence

Identifiers

PMID40381316
PMCPMC12085195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.