ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
Making and disposing of life's 'starting materials': A focus group study of attitudes concerning reproductive scarcity and abundance in in vitro gametogenesis.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Considerations for the future of in vitro gametogenesis in fertility care.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- The Use of Stem Cells in Assisted Reproduction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper explores stakeholder attitudes toward gametes and embryos in the context of in vitro gametogenesis (IVG), a new stem cell technology whose future clinical application would entail the production of eggs and sperm in vitro. A key concern raised by the prospect of making gametes from originally non-reproductive body cells has been its potential exacerbation of the issue of "surplus" cryopreserved embryos through the production of unprecedented numbers, with an allied devaluation of human reproductive materials. However, this concern has not been empirically investigated. In this study, focus groups composed of individuals representative of the constituency most likely to be impacted by IVG were asked to respond to scenarios in which the relative abundance and scarcity of gametes and embryos were changed by these new procedures. Respondents who had experienced involuntary childlessness and/or previously accessed in vitro fertilization (IVF) technology drew on these experiences to reason their way through future scenarios in which cells could be more fluidly exchanged over the somatic-reproductive boundary. Unfettered abundance was not found to be a key issue for these respondents. Rather, concerns focused on questions of technological control over outcomes in ARTs, cultural scripts about the preciousness of eggs moderated by concordance between the gender or the donor and the sex of the gamete, and in vitro gametes and embryos as embodiments of the often painful and costly process of attaining them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.