Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40381284›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025

Excess neonatal mortality among private facility births in rural parts of high-mortality states of India: Demographic analysis of a national survey.

Diane Coffey, Nikhil Srivastav, Aditi Priya, Asmita Verma, Nathan Franz, Alok Kumar, Dean Spears

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diane CoffeyUT Austin Population Research Center, United States; r.i.c.e., a Research Institute for Compassionate Economics (riceinstitute.org), United States. Electronic address: coffey@utexas.edu.
Nikhil SrivastavResearch and Action for Health in India (RAAHI), Uttar Pradesh, India.
Aditi PriyaDepartment of Sociology, Brown University, United States.
Asmita VermaDepartment of Economics & Social Sciences, IIM Visakhapatnam, India.
Nathan FranzUT Austin Population Research Center, United States; r.i.c.e., a Research Institute for Compassionate Economics (riceinstitute.org), United States.
Alok KumarGovernment of Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dean SpearsUT Austin Population Research Center, United States; r.i.c.e., a Research Institute for Compassionate Economics (riceinstitute.org), United States.

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Catherine A Calder · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Projecting the future of early life mortality in the developing worldK01HD098313 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SPEARS, DEAN · 2019 to 2023
$661k
Family dynamics, maternal stress, and the biomarkers of healthy pregnancyK01HD103999 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI COFFEY, DIANE · 2021 to 2025
$657k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD098313NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD103999NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost one-fourth of neonatal deaths occur in India, many of them in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states. Research has compared facility births with home births, with limited investigation of mortality differences between births at public and private facilities. We ask how early-life mortality in the rural population of the EAG states and the rest of India differs according to the setting of birth. We consider whether quality of care can help explain the differences we find. Using rural births in India's 2019-21 Demographic and Health Survey, we find that in the rural population of EAG states, neonatal mortality among private facility births is 44 per 1000 (95 % CI: 40-48), compared with 29 per 1000 in public facilities (95 % CI: 27-30) and 38 per 1000 for home births (95 % CI: 34-41). Standardization by socioeconomic status increases the public-private gap. These differences persist even stratifying on key predictors of neonatal mortality. The excess mortality among births to the rural population in private facilities, compared with public facilities, accounts for about 43,000 excess neonatal deaths annually in EAG states. Evidence suggests that low-quality care is among the important causes. Most births in India now occur in facilities. Many happen in private facilities run by providers who lack training, resources, and legal permission. The quality of private health facilities serving the rural EAG population appears to be particularly poor.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityPrivate FacilitiesRural PopulationAdultDemographyFemaleHome ChildbirthHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40381284
PMCPMC13580888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.