ArticleThe Libyan journal of medicine2025
One-third Radius bone mineral density measurement utility in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: a comparative analysis with femoral and lumbar spine bone mineral density.
Article in The Libyan journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is defined by a BMD ≤ 2.5 SD below the young adult reference population. Standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans for osteoporosis involve the femoral neck and lumbar spine, but alternative sites like the one-third radius (1/3 R) are only used when these sites are inaccessible. This study assessed the correlation and level of agreement between BMD at the 1/3 R, femoral neck, and lumbar spine to evaluate its diagnostic utility. Data from 43,801 patients referred for DXA scans in northwest England were analysed. Of these, 437 underwent 1/3 R scans. Demographic comparisons between patients with and without forearm scans were conducted. The primary analysis included patients with scans at the 1/3 R, lumbar spine, and bilateral femoral regions;(
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.