ArticleEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2025
Toxicity study of TEoS-DAZA, a chemical precursor for functional liver imaging with PET/CT.
Article in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cholangio-PET/CT with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- [Management of postoperative bile leaks].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Utility of DynamicBiomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundN,1,4-Tri(4-ethoxy-2-hydroxybenzyl)-1,4-diazepan-6-amine (TEoS-DAZA), a novel radiopharmaceutical precursor for a liver-specific
resultsThis randomized study was conducted using Wistar rats. The test item was administered intravenously at three different dose levels, the vehicle solution was administered to a separate group as control. Toxicity assessment included a 24 h observation period in three dose groups, and a 14-day recovery period in the high dose group. Animals were monitored regarding clinical behaviour, bodyweight, food and water consumption, additionally undergoing modified IRWIN, grip-strength and beam-walking tests. Following euthanisation, extensive haematological and clinical biochemical parameters were analysed. Necropsy and histopathology were performed. There was no evidence to any test-item related adversities at any dose level. No delayed effects were identified in any animal at the end of the recovery phase. Some small, albeit significant changes in haematology and clinical biochemistry could not be related to the test item administration. The NOAEL of TEoS-DAZA was determined at 1.4 mg/kg bodyweight.
conclusionsAdministration of a thousandfold clinical dose of TEoS-DAZA in rats did not cause any observable adverse events. An injectable solution of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.