ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2025
ResNeXt-Based Rescoring Model for Proteoform Characterization in Top-Down Mass Spectra.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Top-Down Mass Spectrometry and Its Current Applications in Biomarker Discovery in Aging and Age-Related Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In top-down proteomics, the accurate identification and characterization of proteoform through mass spectrometry represents a critical objective. As a result, achieving accuracy in identification results is essential. Multiple primary structure alterations in proteins generate a diverse range of proteoforms, resulting in an exponential increase in potential proteoform. Moreover, the absence of a definitive reference set complicates the standardization of results. Therefore, enhancing the accuracy of proteoform characterization continues to be a significant challenge. We introduced a ResNeXt-based deep learning model, PrSMBooster, for rescoring proteoform spectrum matches (PrSM) during proteoform characterization. As an ensemble method, PrSMBooster integrates four machine learning models, logistic regression, XGBoost, decision tree, and support vector machine, as weak learners to obtain PrSM features. The basic and latent features of PrSM are subsequently input into the ResNeXt model for final rescoring. To verify the effect and accuracy of the PrSMBooster model in rescoring proteoform characterization, it was compared with the characterization algorithm TopPIC across 47 independent mass spectrometry datasets from various species. The experimental results indicate that in most mass spectrometry datasets, the number of PrSMs obtained after rescoring with PrSMBooster increases at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1%. Further analysis of the experimental results confirmed that PrSMBooster improves the accuracy of PrSM scoring, generates more mass spectrometry characterization results, and demonstrates strong generalization ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.