ArticleJA clinical reports2025
Comprehensive evaluation of coagulability using thromboelastography in four patients with essential thrombocythemia.
Article in JA clinical reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEssential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by increased platelet count and risk of thrombosis and bleeding, which necessitates careful perioperative management. However, there are no standardized guidelines for perioperative antithrombotic therapy, and optimal preoperative evaluation remains unclear. In this report, we evaluate the utility of thromboelastography (TEG®6 s) for assessing coagulation and platelet function in ET patients undergoing surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: Four ET patients (platelet counts: 289,000-833,000/µL) underwent thromboelastography at anesthesia induction. Two had normal coagulation, while two had a hypercoagulable state undetected by conventional tests. Hypercoagulability was observed in patients who discontinued anticoagulants or antiplatelets preoperatively.
conclusionsThromboelastography identified thrombotic tendencies not evident with conventional coagulation tests, suggesting its potential for perioperative risk assessment in ET patients. This approach may improve individualized coagulation management beyond use of platelet counts and standard tests. Further studies are needed to establish the role of thromboelastography in optimizing perioperative antithrombotic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.