ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Assessment and Integration of Large Language Models for Automated Electronic Health Record Documentation in Emergency Medical Services.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Language Model for Pediatric Occupational Therapy Documentation: Model Development and Pilot Study.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Large Language Models for Automated SimpleFoot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- When Agentic LLMs Trust Poisoned Tools: Vulnerability of Clinical LLMs to Adversarial Guidelines.Research square · 2026Article
- Assessing Guideline Knowledge Alignment of Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Preclinical Benchmarking Study on KLEx Evidence-Based Guidelines.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Navigating the artificial intelligence landscape in trauma, critical care and emergency general surgery: insights from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) 2025 Annual Meeting Panel Discussion.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Review
- Large language models in emergency medicine education: opportunities, challenges, and implementation pathways.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Clinical Obesity Through the Lens of Context-Aware Large Language Models.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review From Diagnosis to Rehabilitation.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automating Electronic Health Records (EHR) documentation can significantly reduce the burden on care providers, particularly in emergency care settings where rapid and accurate record-keeping is crucial. A critical aspect of this automation involves using natural language processing (NLP) techniques to convert transcribed conversations into structured EHR fields. For instance, extracting temperature values like "102.4 Fahrenheit" from the transcribed text "His temperature is 39.1, which is 102.4 Fahrenheit." However, traditional rule-based and single-model NLP approaches often struggle with domain-specific medical terminology, contextual ambiguity, and numerical extraction errors. This study investigates the potential of integrating multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance EMS documentation accuracy. We developed an LLM integration framework and evaluated four state-of-the-art LLMs-Claude 3.5, GPT-4, Gemini, and Mistral-on a dataset comprising transcribed conversations from 40 EMS training simulations. The evaluation focused on precision, recall, and F1 score across zero-shot and few-shot learning scenarios. Results showed that the integrated LLM framework outperformed individual models, achieving overall F1 scores of 0.78 (zero-shot) and 0.81 (few-shot). In addition to quantitative evaluation, a preliminary user study was conducted with domain experts to assess the perceived usefulness and challenges of the integrated framework. The findings suggest that this approach has the potential to reduce documentation effort compared to traditional manual documentation. However, challenges such as misinterpretation of medical context and occasional omissions were noted, highlighting areas for further refinement and future work. This research is the first to systematically explore and evaluate the use of LLMs for real-time EMS EHR documentation. By addressing key challenges in automated transcription and structured data extraction, our work lays a foundation for real-world implementation, improving efficiency and accuracy in emergency medical documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40381087What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.