Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40381087›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2025

Assessment and Integration of Large Language Models for Automated Electronic Health Record Documentation in Emergency Medical Services.

Enze Bai, Xiao Luo, Zhan Zhang, Kathleen Adelgais, Humaira Ali, Jack Finkelstein, Jared Kutzin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Enze BaiSchool of Computer Science and Information Systems, Pace University, New York City, NY, USA.
Xiao LuoDepartment of Management Science and Information Systems, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. xiao.luo@okstate.edu.
Zhan ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Information Systems, Pace University, New York City, NY, USA. zzhang@pace.edu.
Kathleen AdelgaisSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Humaira AliMaimonides Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Jack FinkelsteinInterfaith Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Jared KutzinMount Sinai Hospital, New York City, NY, USA.

Funding

Design and Development of an Evidence-based Cognitive Aid for Out-of-Hospital Treatment of Pediatric PatientsR15LM014556 · NLM · PACE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK · PI ZHANG, ZHAN · 2024 to 2024
$419k
National Science Foundation 2237097NLM NIH HHS R15 LM014556U.S. National Library of Medicine 1R15LM014556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automating Electronic Health Records (EHR) documentation can significantly reduce the burden on care providers, particularly in emergency care settings where rapid and accurate record-keeping is crucial. A critical aspect of this automation involves using natural language processing (NLP) techniques to convert transcribed conversations into structured EHR fields. For instance, extracting temperature values like "102.4 Fahrenheit" from the transcribed text "His temperature is 39.1, which is 102.4 Fahrenheit." However, traditional rule-based and single-model NLP approaches often struggle with domain-specific medical terminology, contextual ambiguity, and numerical extraction errors. This study investigates the potential of integrating multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance EMS documentation accuracy. We developed an LLM integration framework and evaluated four state-of-the-art LLMs-Claude 3.5, GPT-4, Gemini, and Mistral-on a dataset comprising transcribed conversations from 40 EMS training simulations. The evaluation focused on precision, recall, and F1 score across zero-shot and few-shot learning scenarios. Results showed that the integrated LLM framework outperformed individual models, achieving overall F1 scores of 0.78 (zero-shot) and 0.81 (few-shot). In addition to quantitative evaluation, a preliminary user study was conducted with domain experts to assess the perceived usefulness and challenges of the integrated framework. The findings suggest that this approach has the potential to reduce documentation effort compared to traditional manual documentation. However, challenges such as misinterpretation of medical context and occasional omissions were noted, highlighting areas for further refinement and future work. This research is the first to systematically explore and evaluate the use of LLMs for real-time EMS EHR documentation. By addressing key challenges in automated transcription and structured data extraction, our work lays a foundation for real-world implementation, improving efficiency and accuracy in emergency medical documentation.

Indexed as

DocumentationElectronic Health RecordsEmergency Medical ServicesNatural Language ProcessingHumansLarge Language Models

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.