Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40381086›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025

Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale.

Adalberto Campo-Arias, Edwin Herazo, John Carlos Pedrozo-Pupo

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adalberto Campo-AriasUniversidad del Magdalena, Calle 29H3 No. 22-01, Santa Marta, 470004, Colombia. acampoa@unimagdalena.edu.co.ORCID 0000-0003-2201-7404
Edwin HerazoInstituto de Investigación del Comportamiento Humano, 110221, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9461-7997
John Carlos Pedrozo-PupoUniversidad del Magdalena, Calle 29H3 No. 22-01, Santa Marta, 470004, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-5675-7016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a brief instrument to identify sleep propensity. However, little is known about the psychometric performance of the Spanish version in university students. The study aimed to study the validity and reliability of the ESS in Colombian university students.

methodsA psychometric study was designed with 465 students of health-related careers between 18 and 29 years old (M = 20.48, SD = 2.27); 66.67% of the students were women. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, comparisons of scores between men and women, correlations with insomnia (Athens Insomnia Scale, AIS), anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), and sleep hygiene (SHI-10) and sex differential item functioning as indicators of validity and Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega were calculated as estimators of internal consistency.

resultsThe ESS showed a unidimensional structure, similar scores in men and women, statistically significant correlations with AIS, GAD-7, PHQ-9, and SHI-10, without sex differential item functioning, and high internal consistency (Cronabch's alpha and McDonald's omega of 0.82).

conclusionThe Spanish version of the ESS presents acceptable validity and reliability indicators in Colombian university students. However, these findings must be corroborated in other samples of Spanish-speaking participants.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonDisorders of Excessive SomnolenceAdolescentAdultColombiaFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultReliabilitySleepinessUniversity studentsValidation studiesValidity

Identifiers

PMID40381086
PMCPMC12085383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.