Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40381067›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025

Visual outcomes of aberration neutral versus monofocal plus IOLs in triple DMEK surgery.

Karanpreet Multani, Liam Redden, David Hoang, Scott Vadala, Nitin Rangu, Justin D Dvorak, Kai Ding, Jascha Wendelstein, Kamran M Riaz

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karanpreet MultaniDean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Liam ReddenDean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
David HoangCollege of Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Scott VadalaDean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Nitin RanguCollege of Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Justin D DvorakDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Kai DingDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Jascha WendelsteinInstitut Für Refraktive Und Ophthalmo-Chirurgie (IROC), Zurich, Switzerland.
Kamran M RiazDean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA. Kamran-Riaz@dmei.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1090-5025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare visual acuity outcomes of two monofocal IOL models, a zero-aberration monofocal IOL (Envista MX60E; Bausch and Lomb) and a monofocal plus IOL (Eyhance DIB00; Johnson and Johnson), in eyes undergoing combined cataract surgery and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) (triple DMEK).

methodsRetrospective, single-center case series of 91 eyes (66 patients) undergoing triple DMEK with either IOL between 2019 and 2023 at a tertiary academic center. Eyes were divided into 2 groups: zero-aberration IOL (49 eyes) and monofocal plus IOL (42 eyes). Among these, 20 eyes received a zero-aberration IOL, and 26 eyes received a monofocal plus IOL in both eyes. Visual acuity measurements at 3-6 months and 6-12 months postoperatively included uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near (UDVA, UIVA, UNVA) and distance-corrected distance, intermediate, and near (CDVA, DCIVA, DCNVA) visual acuities for monocular (Uni) and binocular (Bi) assessments. Patients were administered the Intraocular Lens Satisfaction questionnaire to assess their level of spectacle independence at the 3-6 month visit. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests.

resultsUDVA

conclusionBoth IOLs can provide favorable corrected and uncorrected VA in triple DMEK eyes. Eyhance may provide better DCIVA

Indexed as

Descemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyLenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationPseudophakiaRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesIntermediate visionMonofocal plus IOLTriple DMEKZero-Aberration IOL

Identifiers

PMID40381067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.