Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40381059›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2025

Optimising survivorship post-BMT: healthcare professionals' perceptions of long-term care.

Gemma McErlean, Christine Ashley, Anisha Pradhan, Vanessa Yenson, Ian Kerridge, Elizabeth Halcomb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gemma McErleanSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia. gmcerlean@uow.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6496-5678
Christine AshleySchool of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Anisha PradhanSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Vanessa YensonThe Centre for Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ian KerridgeRoyal North Shore Hospital and Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Elizabeth HalcombSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survivors who have received a blood or marrow transplant (BMT) require life-long follow-up care and support, however evidence-based assessments of long-term models of care are scarce. This qualitative descriptive study explored the perspectives of blood and marrow transplant (BMT) specialist nurses and physicians, and General Practitioners (GPs) regarding the long-term management and follow-up care of BMT survivors. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with thirteen purposefully selected BMT Physicians (n = 4), Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) (n = 6) and GPs (n = 3), experienced in providing long-term care to BMT survivors. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Both specialist and community-based practitioners identified deficiencies in models of care delivery and in the organisation of long-term care for BMT survivors, particularly in relation to communication, transition and personalisation of care. Two themes were identified that explored (1) Efficiency and quality of current care provision for BMT survivors and (2) Characteristics of optimal care. All participants recognised the need for flexible, patient-centred models of shared care that bring together hospital and community-based healthcare professionals in providing optimal care to BMT survivors. The growing population of survivors of BMT requires an urgent re-evaluation of healthcare models to address their complex long-term care needs. This will require a well-trained primary care-based workforce supported by collaborative relationships with specialist centres and easy access to essential information. Current approaches to post-BMT care that limit provision of care to specialist BMT services are unsustainable, inefficient, and do not support the transition of patients from tertiary to community healthcare services.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBone Marrow TransplantationHealth PersonnelLong-Term CareSurvivorshipAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchBlood and marrow transplantCommunicationData accessHealth professional roleModels of careShared careSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID40381059
PMCPMC12141104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.