ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Predictors of difficulty in robotic splenic flexure mobilization during rectal cancer surgery.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Splenic flexure mobilization using a fusion surgery technique in robotic left hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a video vignette.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Article
- Correlation between male pelvic and soft tissue parameters based on three-dimensional reconstruction and the difficulty of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Radiological Stage of Hemophilic Arthropathy of Knee Does Not Correlate With Clinical Variables.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn surgery for rectal cancer, splenic flexure mobilization is sometimes necessary to ensure a tension-free colorectal anastomosis with adequate blood supply. Splenic flexure mobilization is regarded as a challenging and risky maneuver, but there are no clear indicators of its difficulty in rectal cancer surgery. This study evaluated the impact of clinical and anatomical factors, including splenic flexure height measured qualitatively on the basis of vertebral level using computed tomography, on the difficulty of splenic flexure mobilization during rectal cancer surgery.
methodsThe enrolled patients underwent robotic splenic flexure mobilization during rectal surgery for primary rectal cancer at Shizuoka Cancer Center in Japan between December 2011 and March 2022. All patients were scheduled to undergo splenic flexure mobilization preoperatively, and all procedures were carried out following a standardized approach. Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the clinical and anatomical factors significantly influencing the operative time of the abdominal phase, which is defined as the duration from lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery to the mobilization of the sigmoid and descending colon, including the splenic flexure.
resultsThe median operative time for the abdominal phase was 88 min (range, 39-179 min). Univariate analysis revealed that the following variables were significantly correlated with a prolonged abdominal phase: higher body mass index, larger visceral fat area, and higher splenic flexure. In a multiple linear regression analysis, only higher splenic flexure remained significantly associated with a longer abdominal phase (p < 0.01).
conclusionsSplenic flexure height measured on the basis of vertebral level using computed tomography may be useful for predicting the difficulty of robotic splenic flexure mobilization in surgery for rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.