Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40381026›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Prediction of cervical spondylotic myelopathy from a plain radiograph using deep learning with convolutional neural networks.

Hiroyuki Tachi, Terufumi Kokabu, Hisataka Suzuki, Yoko Ishikawa, Akito Yabu, Yasushi Yanagihashi, Takahiko Hyakumachi, Tomohiro Shimizu, Tsutomu Endo, Takashi Ohnishi and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hiroyuki TachiHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Terufumi KokabuHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. m990015jp@yahoo.ne.jp.
Hisataka SuzukiHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoko IshikawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eniwa Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Akito YabuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eniwa Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yasushi YanagihashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eniwa Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takahiko HyakumachiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eniwa Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tomohiro ShimizuHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Tsutomu EndoHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Takashi OhnishiHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Daisuke UkebaHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hideki SudoHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Katsuhisa YamadaHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. yka2q@pop.med.hokudai.ac.jp.
Norimasa IwasakiHokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to develop deep learning algorithms (DLAs) utilising convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) from plain cervical spine radiographs.

methodsData from 300 patients (150 with CSM and 150 with CSR) were used for internal validation (IV) using five-fold cross-validation strategy. Additionally, 100 patients (50 with CSM and 50 with CSR) were included in the external validation (EV). Two DLAs were trained using CNNs on plain radiographs from C3-C6 for the binary classification of CSM and CSR, and for the prediction of the spinal canal area rate using magnetic resonance imaging. Model performance was evaluated on external data using metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and likelihood ratios.

resultsFor the binary classification, the AUC ranged from 0.84 to 0.96, with accuracy between 78% and 95% during IV. In the EV, the AUC and accuracy were 0.96 and 90%, respectively. For the spinal canal area rate, correlation coefficients during five-fold cross-validation ranged from 0.57 to 0.64, with a mean correlation of 0.61 observed in the EV.

conclusionDLAs developed with CNNs demonstrated promising accuracy for classifying CSM and CSR from plain radiographs. These algorithms have the potential to assist non-specialists in identifying patients who require further evaluation or referral to spine specialists, thereby reducing delays in the diagnosis and treatment of CSM.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerRadiculopathySpinal Cord DiseasesSpondylosisAdultAgedConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyArtificial intelligenceCervical spine radiographsCervical spondylotic myelopathyCervical spondylotic radiculopathyConvolutional neural networksDeep learning algorithms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.