Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40381011›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025

Advancing fungal keratitis treatment: transitioning from conventional amphotericin B therapy to nanocarrier-based delivery systems.

Gourav Kumar, Aians H Kalita, Jabin Ahmed, Shubhi Saxena, Subhi Sharma, Astha Mehta, Amit Sharma, Balak Das Kurmi, Ghanshyam Das Gupta, Shubham Thakur

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gourav KumarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Aians H KalitaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Jabin AhmedDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Shubhi SaxenaDepartment of Quality Assurance, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Subhi SharmaDepartment of Quality Assurance, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Astha MehtaDepartment of Quality Assurance, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Amit SharmaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Balak Das KurmiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Ghanshyam Das GuptaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India.
Shubham ThakurDepartment of Pharmaceutics, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, 142001, Punjab, India. shubhamdthakur@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5857-2624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal keratitis (FK) is a serious, vision-threatening ocular infection caused by various fungal species. Poor outcomes often leave patients with corneal opacification and loss of vision, occasionally advancing to enucleation due to the lack of effective treatment options. Several health agencies have outlined topical antifungal medications as first-line approaches in treating FK. Commercially available topical antifungal formulations are natamycin (5%), voriconazole (1%), fluconazole (0.2-0.5%), itraconazole (1%), and amphotericin B (0.15%). Different molecules remain effective against various species of fungus. However, amphotericin B (Am-B) is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent, and when all other medications fail, Am-B is the only drug of choice. However, its clinical application is hindered due to the non-availability of ophthalmic marketed products because of its poor pharmaco-technical factors (low solubility, poor permeation, unstable in solutions of pH 3-10, etc.). Therefore, clinicians are forced to use Am-B injectables off-label by preparing the diluted concentrations of Am-B for ophthalmic use. These solutions have limitations, viz., poor stability, rapid precorneal clearance, and limited drug retention. Thus, it is highly essential for the development of advanced ophthalmic novel drug delivery systems so that the therapeutic and toxic profiles of drugs might improve. Therefore, the present review explores the limitations of conventional Am-B therapy and highlights the transformative potential of nanocarrier-based delivery systems in FK management. It discusses various nanocarrier strategies, their pharmacokinetics, and preclinical and clinical advancements. By bridging the gap between conventional treatments and modern nanotechnology, this review underscores the potential of nanocarriers to revolutionize FK treatment, offering more effective and patient-friendly therapeutic solutions.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDrug Delivery SystemsEye Infections, FungalKeratitisNanoparticle Drug Delivery SystemAnimalsDrug CarriersHumansAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDrug CarriersNanoparticle Drug Delivery SystemAmphotericin BCorneal ulcerFungal keratitisInfectionManagemental strategyNanotechnologyPathophysiologyStructural properties

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.