Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380984›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2025

Evaluation of the Safety and Regenerative Potential of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles in a Transgenic Pig Model of Cartilage-Bone Injury In Vivo - Preclinical Study.

Anna Łabędź-Masłowska, Jarosław Wieczorek, Maciej Mierzwiński, Małgorzata Sekuła-Stryjewska, Sylwia Noga, Jolanta Rajca, Piotr Duda, Katarzyna Milian-Ciesielska, Elżbieta Karnas, Katarzyna Kmiotek-Caller and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anna Łabędź-Masłowska *Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8088-6221
Jarosław Wieczorek *University Center of Veterinary Medicine UJ-UR, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5579-4870
Maciej MierzwińskiDepartment of Science, Innovation and Development, Galen-Orthopaedics, Bierun, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-6411-8034
Małgorzata Sekuła-StryjewskaDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9511-9498
Sylwia NogaDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4475-187X
Jolanta RajcaDepartment of Science, Innovation and Development, Galen-Orthopaedics, Bierun, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6836-4738
Piotr DudaInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3575-5641
Katarzyna Milian-CiesielskaDepartment of Pathomorphology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5777-9591
Elżbieta KarnasDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9956-1593
Katarzyna Kmiotek-CallerDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6298-2853
Agnieszka SzkaradekDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4901-9621
Zbigniew MadejaDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5523-1215
Krzysztof FicekDepartment of Science, Innovation and Development, Galen-Orthopaedics, Bierun, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3027-9984
Jacek JuraDepartment of Reproductive Biotechnology and Cryoconservation, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice, Poland. jacek.jura@iz.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-1544-1733
Ewa Zuba-SurmaDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland. ewa.zuba-surma@uj.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-6814-6127

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju STRATEGMED3/303570/7/NCBR/2017Narodowym Centrum Nauki 2019/34/A/NZ3/00134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint condition leading to disability. The lack of effective treatment for OA creates a need for the development of new therapeutic approaches that may rely on stem cells including mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) and their derivatives such as extracellular vesicles (EVs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of MSCs derived from adipose tissue (AT-MSCs) and umbilical cord (UC-MSCs) and their EVs on cartilage-bone injury in vivo, to identify the specimen with the highest regenerative potential for further clinical applications in patients with OA. Humanized pigs underwent cartilage-bone injuries followed by intraarticular administration of products containing AT-MSCs, UC-MSCs, AT-MSC-EVs or UC-MSC-EVs mixed with hyaluronic acid (HA) or HA alone (for comparison). After 6-m follow-up, almost-fully-healed cartilage-bone defects were observed in the AT-MSC- and UC-MSC-treated pigs, and the defects were filled primarily with hyaline cartilage. In AT-MSC-EV- and UC-MSC-EV-treated pigs, a partial cartilage-bone tissue repair was observed, and the defects were filled primarily with fibrocartilage. The control pigs demonstrated limited regeneration capacity. The microcomputed tomography parameters of the subchondral bone indicated the ongoing progression of OA in controls, whereas in the MSC- and MSC-EV-treated pigs, the parameters indicated the cessation of OA progression. Moreover, no serious side effects were observed after the administration of products containing MSCs or MSC-EVs. The results indicate the safety and regenerative activity of MSCs on injured tissues, which favors not only the healing and improvement of bone structure but also the formation of hyaline cartilage. Superior tissue repair was observed after the administration of products containing AT-MSCs. The treatment of OA with MSC-EVs needs further standardization.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesCartilage, ArticularExtracellular VesiclesMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRegenerationAdipose TissueAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDisease Models, AnimalHumansHyaluronic AcidOsteoarthritisSwineHyaluronic AcidAdipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cellsATMPsExtracellular vesiclesOsteoarthritisTransgenic pig model of cartilage-bone injuryUmbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells

Identifiers

PMID40380984
PMCPMC12102096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.