Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380966›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2025

Associations Among Sociodemographic and Contextual Factors and Youth Pregnancy Preferences.

Sarah F Nathan, Susan A Chapman, Claire D Brindis, Corinne H Rocca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah F NathanUniversity of California, San Francisco, School of Nursing, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: sarah.nathan@ucsf.edu.
Susan A ChapmanUniversity of California, San Francisco, School of Nursing, Social and Behavioral Sciences, San Francisco, California.
Claire D BrindisPhilip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Corinne H RoccaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, Oakland, California.

Funding

Pregnancy preferences, reproductive autonomy, and maternal health: A novel prospective studyR01HD108643 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Corinne H. Rocca · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD108643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEfforts to improve access to and use of contraception among young people have often inadequately accounted for the diversity in feelings youth hold about a potential pregnancy. Research using validated measures, is needed to investigate the distribution of pregnancy preferences among youth (15-24 years old) and identify contextual factors that may shape these preferences.

methodsA series of bivariate regression models and one multivariate regression model were run using data from the Attitudes and Decision Making After Pregnancy Testing (ADAPT) study, including n = 1,020 assigned female at birth youth recruited from 23 health facilities in the southwestern United States. Pregnancy preferences were measured with the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy (DAP) scale, a prospective validated measure.

resultsA range of DAP scale scores (pregnancy preferences) were found, with a mean of 2.5 (standard deviation 1.1, 0 = greatest openness to pregnancy, 4 = strongest desire to avoid pregnancy). Parous (1.98 vs. 2.63 nulliparous; aCoeff. -0.38, p ≤ .001) and more religious youth (2.16 vs. 2.68 without religion; aCoeff. -0.47, p ≤ .001) were relatively more open to the prospect of pregnancy (e.g., lower DAP score). Those without a main partner (2.79 vs. 2.41 in a relationship; aCoeff. 0.37, p ≤ .001), who were in school (2.80 vs. 2.25 not in school; aCoeff. 0.45, p ≤ .001), and those experiencing depressive symptoms (2.70 vs. 2.40 not depressed; aCoeff. 0.19, p ≤ .01) expressed stronger desire to avoid pregnancy. DISCUSSION: Youth pregnancy preferences are diverse and shaped by their partnership status, prior childbearing, social context, and mental health.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorPregnancy in AdolescenceAdolescentDecision MakingFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSouthwestern United StatesYoung AdultAdolescentPregnancyPregnancy preferencesUnplannedYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID40380966
PMCPMC12170146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.