Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380895›Full record

ArticleAssessment2026

Compassion Questionnaires Revised: Scales Development and Validation.

Bassam Khoury, Rodrigo C Vergara

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bassam KhouryMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6120-2173
Rodrigo C VergaraUniversidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Compassion Questionnaires for Self and Others were developed to measure compassion as a multifaceted construct encompassing affective, cognitive, behavioral, and interpersonal dimensions. However, the original versions had limitations such as item number and coverage of the underlying concepts, unidirectional item wording, lack of a global latent variable, and validation only among women. This study aimed to address these shortcomings by revising the questionnaires to improve their psychometric properties. The revised Compassion Questionnaires for Self and Others underwent significant modifications. A large-scale validation study involving both women and non-women participants was conducted to evaluate the revised questionnaires. The final versions of the revised compassion questionnaires comprised 39 items for self-compassion and 33 items for compassion toward others, incorporating both positive and negative wording. Psychometric analysis indicated excellent reliability and validity, with evidence supporting the existence of global latent variables. The revised questionnaires represent a significant improvement over the original versions, offering a comprehensive operationalization of compassion constructs suitable for diverse populations. The study findings underscore the theoretical and practical significance of these questionnaires in assessing and cultivating compassion. However, certain limitations warrant consideration, and the implications for research and clinical practice are thoroughly discussed.

Indexed as

EmpathyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcompassionquestionnairescaleself-compassionskills

Identifiers

PMID40380895
PMCPMC13153449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.