ArticleGenetics2025
More than meets the eye: mutation of the white gene in Drosophila has broad phenotypic and transcriptomic effects.
Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Distribution Analysis of the Lifespan Trait in Drosophila.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The white gene, one of the most widely used genetic markers in Drosophila research, serves as a standard background mutation for transgene insertions and genetic manipulations. While its primary function involves eye pigmentation, mutations in white have been associated with diverse phenotypic effects, including those related to metabolism, behavior, and stress responses. However, many of the published studies do not account for differences in genetic background, raising concerns about the interpretation of experimental results. To address this, we generated fly lines through 10 generations of backcrossing that are highly genetically similar except at the white locus, minimizing background variation. Given the likely metabolic consequences of white gene deletion and its role in neurotransmitter production, we focused on behavioral, metabolic, and fitness-related traits and performed transcriptomic analysis on adult fly heads. Our findings both confirm and refine previous observations, revealing that some reported effects of white mutation are robust while others likely reflect underlying genetic background differences. These results emphasize the necessity of genetic background control in Drosophila research and warrant caution when using white mutants as a baseline for comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.