Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380501›Full record

ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2025

A Customizable Data Quality Tool for Global Observational Research Networks.

Judith Lewis, Brenna Hogan, Charles Goss, Dhanushi Rupasinghe, Fernanda Maruri, Kalongo Hamusonde, Savannah Obregon, Mansi Agarwal, Awachana Jiamsakul, Megan Turner and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Judith LewisVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Brenna HoganJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Charles GossWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Dhanushi RupasingheThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Fernanda MaruriVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kalongo HamusondeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Savannah ObregonVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mansi AgarwalWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Awachana JiamsakulThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Megan TurnerVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Austin KatonaVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Keri AlthoffJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stephany N DudaVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

North American AIDS Cohorts on Collaboration and Design (NAACCORD)U01AI069918 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Keri Nicole Althoff, RICHARD Douglas MOORE · 2006 to 2026
$65.2M
The Asia-Pacific HIV Research CollaborationU01AI069907 · NIAID · FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH · PI ANNETTE H SOHN · 2006 to 2026
$44.8M
TB-RICC 3.0U01AI174268 · NIAID · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jerrold J. Ellner, TIMOTHY R STERLING · 2023 to 2026
$15.7M
Harmonist: A Scalable Toolkit for Standardizing and Coordinating Data Sharing Across International Research NetworksR24AI124872 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Stephany Norah Duda · 2016 to 2026
$12.5M
Supplement: Implementation Research Strategies for Heart, Lung, and Blood Co-morbidities in People Living with HIV - Research Coordinating CenterU24HL154426 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVILA-ROMAN, VICTOR G., GENG, ELVIN H. · 2020 to 2024
$9.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL154426NIAID NIH HHS R24 AI124872NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069907NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069918NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI174268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating data quality is essential when combining multi-site observational clinical data for analysis. We collaborated with five research networks, representing various data approaches and workflows, to generalize an established data quality checking and report generation tool so it could be implemented more easily by other research consortia. The resulting approach reduced the need for technical expertise at user sites by leveraging the REDCap data collection software to store details about a research group, their data model, and expectations about variables (e.g., plausible numeric range, valid format and codes, date logic). The application then used the REDCap API to retrieve those details and assess a dataset's conformance to the data model, logical consistency, and completeness. Users could download reports that summarized the dataset contents and quality. The generalized Harmonist Data Toolkit was built using the freely available REDCap and R/Shiny platforms, with code available on GitHub. All five collaborating consortia found the Toolkit beneficial in detecting inconsistencies and providing informative data reports and visualizations. The Harmonist Data Toolkit fills a need for data quality and report generation solutions for consortia without local programming expertise.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyObservational Studies as TopicSoftwareHumansdata qualityDatasets as topicobservational studiessoftware

Identifiers

PMID40380501
PMCPMC12233329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.