Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380307›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2025

Antifilarial treatment strategies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Muayad Saud Albadrani, Amr Molla, Hossein M Elbadawy, Heba M Eltahir, Shyamkumar Sriram, Mekky M Abouzied, Eman Mohamed Sharaf Elsayed

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Acute Brugian filariasis in a German tourist after short-term travel to Sri Lanka, 2025.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muayad Saud AlbadraniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine and Medical Education, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, 42353, Saudi Arabia. mbadrani@taibahu.edu.sa.
Amr MollaDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, 42353, Saudi Arabia.
Hossein M ElbadawyHealth and Life Research Center, Taibah University, Madinah, 42353, Saudi Arabia.
Heba M EltahirDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Madinah, 42353, Saudi Arabia.
Shyamkumar SriramDepartment of Rehabilitation and Health Services, College of Health and Public Service, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, 76203, USA.
Mekky M AbouziedDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Madinah, 42353, Saudi Arabia.
Eman Mohamed Sharaf ElsayedDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, 42353, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Research, Development, and Innovation Authority (RDIA) - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 12982-iau-2023-TAU-R-3-1-HW
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) prescribes mass drug administration (MDA) to eradicate lymphatic filariasis within endemic populations. The WHO endorsed using ivermectin with diethylcarbamazine and albendazole (IDA) for MDA in specific settings devoid of onchocerciasis or loiasis. Still, the utilization of IDA in sub-Saharan Africa is restricted due to the potential of diethylcarbamazine to induce severe adverse ocular events in individuals with onchocerciasis.

aimWe aim to investigate all documented combinations of antifilarial drugs available in the literature using a network meta-analysis (NWM) design, focusing specifically on the treatment of Lymphatic Filariasis (LF).

methodsA meticulous search was conducted across four electronic databases to identify pertinent studies. Subsequently, a frequentist NWM was executed. Risk ratios (RRs) served as the effect size metric for categorical outcomes, each with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsOur study encompassed 45 studies, including 61,369 patients. At six months, multiple doses of diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole (multiple DA) regimens demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing microfilaremia compared to a single intake of DA, diethylcarbamazine, ivermectin, and albendazole with RR and CI as follows: 0.37 [0.19; 0.72], 0.35 [0.17; 0.69], 0.30 [0.14; 0.64], and 0.28 [0.13; 0.57]. The combination of ivermectin plus albendazole (IA) also showed significant efficacy against the use of each of these drugs alone, with RR: 0.74 [0.57; 0.96] for ivermectin and 0.69 [0.53; 0.89] for albendazole, while diethylcarbamazine combined with albendazole showed substantial superiority over albendazole alone or placebo: RR = 0.09 [0.02; 0.36] and 0.08 [0.02; 0.34], respectively. By the twelfth month, diethylcarbamazine, followed by albendazole, ranked superior to IDA and DA: 0.12 [0.02; 0.89] and 0.11 [0.01; 0.79], respectively. At 24 months, no significant differences were found among the assessed drugs in reducing microfilaremia. The comparisons revealed no significant differences between the drug combinations we studied regarding safety and adverse events.

conclusionMultiple doses of the DA regimen showed superior efficacy in reducing microfilaremia compared to combinations involving IA, diethylcarbamazine, ivermectin, and albendazole at six and twelve months. However, by the twenty-four-month, no significant differences were found. Safety profiles among interventions were generally comparable, with no specific drug showing superiority in adverse events.

Indexed as

Elephantiasis, FilarialFilaricidesAlbendazoleDiethylcarbamazineDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansIvermectinMass Drug AdministrationTreatment OutcomeAlbendazoleDiethylcarbamazineFilaricidesIvermectinAntifilarial drugsDrug efficacyMicrofilaremiaNetwork Meta-Analysissub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID40380307
PMCPMC12084920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.