ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Caregivers' experiences and challenges of the diagnostic odyssey in Dravet syndrome.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rare diseases in Brazil: a nationwide analysis of the diagnostic odyssey.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Global trends in epilepsy and the Chinese experience: Epidemiological transitions, underlying mechanisms, and integrated strategies (1990-2021).Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Review
- Exploring psychosocial experiences in clinically stable generalised Myasthenia Gravis: A thematic analysis.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the genetic background of Dravet syndrome (DS) has been determined and is clearly described, and genetics tests that support a clinical diagnosis are available, DS diagnosis is often based on the clinical assessment alone, which may lead to a late or missed diagnosis. This study explores experiences of caregivers' of persons with DS with the diagnostic odyssey and their perception of its consequences for DS patients.
results106 family caregivers connected with the Association for People with Severe Refractory Epilepsy DRAVET.PL completed an anonymised, self-administered, computer-assisted online survey on parents' experiences of the diagnostic journey conducted from March to June 2024. Although 96.2% of DS parents reported that their children experienced initial symptoms in the first year of life, 58.4% indicated that it took more than a year before DS was diagnosed and 72.7% reported that their DS child received at least one misdiagnosis. While 6.6% of patients were diagnosed by the first doctor consulted, 65.1% had to consult between two and four specialists and 22.8% consulted more than five specialists. 19.8% of parents confirmed that they sought diagnosis abroad. 58.4% of DS parents suggested that delayed diagnosis was harmful to their children's health. Many believed that it resulted in taking unnecessary or inappropriate medications (67%), hospitalisations (32.1%), or medical interventions (15.1%). Many parents reported problems with accessing genetic counselling and psychological support.
conclusionsSince DS parents report the multifaceted and protracted diagnostic journey in their children, underscoring the duration of the diagnostic process, numerous misdiagnoses and the number of healthcare professionals involved in achieving the confirmed DS diagnosis, this study highlights the need for widespread access to genetic testing, which usually concludes the diagnostic odyssey and is crucial for managing the proper treatment plan for DS patients. It also shows the need to increase general practitioners' awareness of the developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) and the creation of more rapid and transparent referral procedures for children with DEE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.