Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380245›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Association of prehospital invasive blood pressure measurement and treatment times of intubated patients with suspected stroke - a retrospective study.

Michael Eichlseder, Nikolaus Schreiber, Alexander Pichler, Michael Eichinger, Sebastian Labenbacher, Barbara Hallmann, Simon Orlob, Paul Zajic, Simon Fandler-Höfler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael EichlsederDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Nikolaus SchreiberDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 2, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Alexander PichlerDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Michael EichingerDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Sebastian LabenbacherDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Barbara HallmannDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Simon OrlobDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 2, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Paul ZajicDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 1, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria. paul.zajic@medunigraz.at.
Simon Fandler-HöflerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive blood pressure measurement is commonly used in in-hospital patients with stroke requiring general anesthesia, but is much less established in the prehospital setting. While it allows for more precise blood pressure management, it might also lead to prehospital treatment delays. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the potential impact of prehospital invasive blood pressure measurement on treatment times.

methodsAdult patients (≥ 18 years) with suspected stroke (both ischemic and hemorrhagic) and prehospital induction of emergency anesthesia by physicians admitted to the University Hospital of Graz between January 1st, 2018 and December 31st, 2023, were included. Optimal one-to-one matching using a propensity score for prehospital invasive blood pressure measurement based on patient age, patient sex, treatment by helicopter emergency medical services and Glasgow coma scale on scene was performed. Primary outcome was the time-interval between on-scene arrival of the prehospital physician and first cranial computed tomography (CCT).

resultsOne hundred patients with suspected stroke and prehospital emergency anesthesia were identified, of whom 67 (67%) had prehospital invasive blood pressure measurement. After matching, 33 patients of each cohort were used for main analysis. Median (25th to 75th percentile) time between on-scene arrival and first CCT was 79 (70-87) minutes in the prehospital measurement group, compared to 73 (67-81) minutes in the group with in-hospital initiation of invasive measurement (p = 0.21). On-scene time was longer in the prehospital group [45 (37-51) vs. 36 (33-43) minutes, p = 0.009], while transport duration [18 (11-25) vs. 20 (13-31) minutes, p = 0.20] and time spent in the resuscitation room [16 (12-20) vs. 16 (12-21) minutes, p = 0.391] did not differ.

conclusionIn summary, among patients with suspected stroke who underwent prehospital intubation, time from on-scene arrival to the first CCT was not prolonged in those who received prehospital invasive blood pressure measurement compared to those who received it in-hospital.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationEmergency Medical ServicesIntubation, IntratrachealStrokeTime-to-TreatmentAgedFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnesthesiaArterial pressureBlood pressureEmergency medical servicesHemodynamic monitoringIntubationStroke

Identifiers

PMID40380245
PMCPMC12083177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.