ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2025
The real-world evidence to the effects of primary psychological healthcare system in diluting risks of suicide ideation in underrepresented children/adolescents: an observational, multi-center, population-based, and longitudinal study.
Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstablishing a primary psychological healthcare system to prevent suicide was eagerly advocated. Such system was developed as a low-cost healthcare framework integrating family, school, and hospitals to provide early psychological screening and intervention. However, it remains unclear whether such a policy-driven and low-cost healthcare system could be practical, especially with equal benefits for underrepresented children/adolescents. We aimed to examine the real-world practical effects of the primary psychological healthcare system in preventing suicide ideation among children/adolescents, particularly underprivileged ones.
methodsThe study was conducted using an observational, multi-center, population-based, and longitudinal design. A total of 19,140 children and adolescents were sampled from lower- and middle-income areas in Nanchong, western China, with the majority for being underprivileged and underrepresented. They were followed up for one year. The primary outcome was the incidence of reported severe suicide ideation after implementing the primary psychological healthcare system at the 0.5-year and 1-year follow-ups, compared to baseline. Subgroup analysis was conducted to examine the equal benefits of the system for underrepresented children/adolescents.
resultsThe risks of suicide ideation for children/adolescents included in the system were found to be significantly lower compared to those not included at 0.5-year (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.28, 95%CI 0.23-0.33; p < 0.001) and 1-year follow-ups (aRR 0.28, 95% CI 0.23-0.33; p < 0.001). The effects were also observed among underrepresented children/adolescents, including "left-behind" children/adolescents, "single-parent" children/adolescents and children/adolescents in especially difficult circumstances (CEDC, all p
conclusionsThe primary psychological healthcare system was effective in reducing suicide ideation risks among children/adolescents over a period of at least 1 year. However, certain underprivileged groups, such as orphans and unattended children, did not experience the same level of benefits, highlighting the need for targeted improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.