ArticleHarm reduction journal2025
Characterizing substance users and risk profiles across treatment centers: insights from Iran.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating treatment outcomes across four substance use treatment settings: a 12-month longitudinal study in Iran.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- The hidden costs of 'free' treatment: A cross-sectional study of patient-incurred costs for daily methadone maintenance treatment in Nairobi, Kenya.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSubstance use remains a pressing global public health concern and has shown a marked increase in recent years. This study investigates the characteristics and risk behaviors of individuals who use substances across various treatment centers in the city of Kerman, Iran.
methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in May 2023 across multiple treatment centers in Kerman. A total of 470 participants were recruited from Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) centers, Therapeutic Community (TC) centers, Article 16 compulsory treatment centers, and Drop-in Centers (DICs). Data were collected using the Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP) questionnaire and laboratory tests, and analyzed using STATA software.
resultsNinety percent of participants were male, with the most common age range being 26 to 45 years. More than 70% reported initiating substance use after the age of 18. Approximately 64.89% had attempted to stop using substances fewer than two times, while 13.62% had made more than six unsuccessful attempts. Patterns of alcohol, opium, and methamphetamine use varied across treatment settings. The highest rates of syringe sharing, unprotected sexual activity, and criminal activity were reported in the Article 16 center, whereas MMT centers reported the highest levels of spousal conflict. TC centers had the lowest levels of methamphetamine and morphine use.
conclusionThe majority of participants were male and began using substances after the age of 18. Patients in the Article 16 center exhibited the highest levels of high-risk behaviors, including injection-based substance use, unprotected sexual activity, and criminal involvement. In contrast, MMT centers showed the highest levels of familial conflict, and TC centers had the lowest prevalence of methamphetamine and morphine use. These findings highlight the need for context-specific harm reduction and treatment strategies tailored to the distinct substance use patterns and risk profiles within each treatment setting. Given the structural and demographic differences-such as voluntary enrollment in MMT versus mandated treatment in Article 16-comparative interpretations should remain descriptive and cautious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.