Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380197›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

TeLePhone Respiratory (TeLePoR) score to assess the risk of immediate respiratory support through phone call for acute dyspnoea: a prospective cohort study.

Frederic Balen, François Saget, Axel Benhamed, Oussama-Ibrahim Boudjemline, Lisa Girard, Elisa Lescanne, Pauline Mimouni, Paul-Georges Reuter, Sandrine Charpentier, Nicolas Marjanovic

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frederic BalenEmergency Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. fred.balen@gmail.com.
François SagetUniv Rennes, CHU Rennes, SMUR / Urgences Adultes, Service SAMU 35, Rennes, France.
Axel BenhamedEmergency Department-SAMU69, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Edouard-Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Oussama-Ibrahim BoudjemlineEmergency Department-SAMU69, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Edouard-Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Lisa GirardEmergency Department-SAMU69, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Edouard-Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Elisa LescanneEmergency Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Pauline MimouniCHU de Poitiers, Service d'Accueil des Urgences et SAMU 86, Poitiers, France.
Paul-Georges ReuterUniv Rennes, CHU Rennes, SMUR / Urgences Adultes, Service SAMU 35, Rennes, France.
Sandrine CharpentierEmergency Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Nicolas MarjanovicCHU de Poitiers, Service d'Accueil des Urgences et SAMU 86, Poitiers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute dyspnea is a frequent cause to call the Emergency Medical Call Center (EMCC). The main challenge for EMCC dispatchers is to quickly identify patients that will require respiratory support in order to provide them with the most accurate prehospital response. Our main objective was to derivate a score assessable during the first call to detect the most severe patients needing medical assistance.

methodsThis prospective observational cohort study was conducted in four different French EMCC from January 22nd to March 7th 2024. Patients over the age of 18 years old that called once the EMCC for acute dyspnea were included in our study. The primary endpoint was an immediate respiratory support requirement (i.e. high-flow oxygen, non-invasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation after intubation) before or at the Emergency Department Registration. Variables of interest to predict respiratory support were prospectively collected in each EMCC. A multivariate analysis by stepwise logistic regression was used to select variables associated with the primary endpoint and to create in the TeLePhon Respiratory Score (TeLePoR score). The TeLePoR score was compared to medical dispatcher intuition for predicting respiratory support.

resultsSix hundred and forty-nine patients were analyzed, including 49 (8%) that required immediate respiratory support. The risk factors included in the TeLePoR score were: altered ability to speak complete sentences (OR = 8.62; CI95% = [3.49-21.3]), abdominal respiration (OR = 2.42; CI95% = [1.23-4.76]), altered consciousness (OR = 2.05; CI95% = [0.90-4.65]) and self-report breathing discomfort > 7/10 (OR = 1.83; CI95% = [0.96-3.47]) respectively. Considering these factors, TeLePoR score presented a 0.810 AUC. Medical dispatcher intuition was not statistically superior to TelePoR score to predict immediate respiratory support (AUC = 0.836 vs. 0.810; p = 0.431).

conclusionTeLePoR score is a simple scoring system including 4 variables to predict immediate respiratory support in patients calling the EMCC for acute dyspnea.

Indexed as

DyspneaEmergency Medical ServicesRespiration, ArtificialTelephoneAcute DiseaseAdultAgedFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentDyspneaEmergency medical call centreRiskTelephone

Identifiers

PMID40380197
PMCPMC12082944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.