Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380193›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Nursing informatics and patient safety outcomes in critical care settings: a systematic review.

Qian Shi, Rosie Wotherspoon, Julia Morphet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qian ShiNursing & Midwifery, Monash University, Austin Health, Melbourne Room 2.32, Level 2, Building E, Peninsula Campus, 47 - 49 Moorooduc Highway, Frankston, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia. qian.shi@monash.edu.
Rosie WotherspoonNursing & Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne Room 2.63, Building E, Peninsula Campus, 47-49 Moorooduc Highway, Frankston, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Julia MorphetNursing & Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne Peninsula Campus, 47 - 49 Moorooduc Highway Frankston, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimConduct a systematic review to analyse how nursing informatics influence patient safety outcomes in critical care settings. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/

designThe following database searches were conducted: Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane library, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL plus, Ovid Emcare, PsycINFO, and Ovid Embase. Two reviewers conducted the data selection and critical appraisal independently, following the JBI evaluation guidelines. Seventeen articles of high quality were included in this review. SETTINGS: This systematic review focused on critical care settings in healthcare facilities, including Emergency Departments, Intensive Care Units, High Dependency Units and Coronary Care Units in public or private hospitals.

main outcome measuresThe overarching outcomes evaluated were patient safety outcomes (e, g, the development of a pressure injury), patient safety outcome measures (i.e., the application of tools used to measure patient safety outcomes e.g. the frequency with which pressure areas are assessed) and the processes of care (e.g. conducting regular pressure area care to prevent pressure injuries).

resultsIn critical care settings, nursing informatics were associated with promotion of patient safety and prevention of adverse incidents, including reducing the incidence of pressure ulcers and medication errors; helping control blood glucose levels; decreasing the length of hospital stay; and improving compliance with care bundles and overall screening completion rates for risks of pressure ulcers, falls, substance use and agitation in emergency departments.

conclusionThe implementation of nursing informatics in critical care areas has been successful in promoting patient safety. While informatics can be costly to introduce, there is evidence these interventions can reduce costs by preventing adverse events. IMPLICATIONS FOR CRITICAL PRACTICE: Electronic health information record systems, clinical decision support systems and telehealth can increase compliance with screening and delivery of care aligned with guidelines across a range of presentations and critical care contexts. With the growing prevalence of nursing informatics, these systems should be considered for more widespread introduction.

Indexed as

Critical careNursing informaticsPatient safetyQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40380193
PMCPMC12083181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.