Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380188›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2025

A bioprocess optimization study to enhance the production of Menaquinone-7 using Bacillus subtilis MM26.

Maneesha M, Subathra Devi C

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metabolic Engineering Strategy forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maneesha MDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Subathra Devi CDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India. csubathradevi@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMenaquinone-7 (MK-7) has a vital significance in promoting human health and tackling several global health concerns which makes its production extremely important. MK-7 is not easily accessible at a reasonable cost due to the poor fermentation yields and the existence of several laborious downstream unit processes. Efficient manufacturing methods are essential to meet the global requirements due to the increasing demand in the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries. This research study focuses on the enhanced production of MK-7 from Bacillus subtilis MM26 isolated from fermented home-made wine.

resultsA suitable MK-7 production medium for Bacillus subtilis MM26 was determined and the yield was found to be 67 ± 0.6 mg/L. The one factor at a time (OFAT) results showed that medium containing lactose, glycine, with a pH 7, a temperature of 37 °C, and an inoculum size of 2.5% (2 × 10⁶ CFU/mL) was optimal synthesis of MK-7. RSM indicated that incubation time, carbon and nitrogen sources were the factors significantly affecting the MK-7 yield. RSM predicted optimal conditions, which yielded a maximum concentration of 442 ± 2.08 mg/L of MK-7.

conclusionsThe outcomes of this study demonstrated the potential of Bacillus subtilis MM26 in large-scale industrial production of MK-7. The yield of MK-7 was amplified efficiently by integration of OFAT and RSM, paving the way for cost-efficient industrial production.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisVitamin K 2CarbonCulture MediaFermentationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationTemperatureCarbonCulture Mediamenaquinone 7Vitamin K 2Bacillus subtilisHome-made wineMenaquinone-7OFATOptimizationProductionRSM

Identifiers

PMID40380188
PMCPMC12082928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.