Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380167›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

Deciphering microbial and metabolic influences in gastrointestinal diseases-unveiling their roles in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease.

Daryll Philip, Rebecca Hodgkiss, Swarnima Kollampallath Radhakrishnan, Akshat Sinha, Animesh Acharjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CD74Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daryll PhilipCancer and Genomic Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham Dubai, Dubai, UAE.
Rebecca HodgkissCancer and Genomic Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Swarnima Kollampallath RadhakrishnanCancer and Genomic Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Akshat SinhaCancer and Genomic Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Animesh AcharjeeCancer and Genomic Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham Dubai, Dubai, UAE. a.acharjee@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2735-7010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGastrointestinal disorders (GIDs) affect nearly 40% of the global population, with gut microbiome-metabolome interactions playing a crucial role in gastric cancer (GC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aims to investigate how microbial and metabolic alterations contribute to disease development and assess whether biomarkers identified in one disease could potentially be used to predict another, highlighting cross-disease applicability.

methodsMicrobiome and metabolome datasets from Erawijantari et al. (GC: n = 42, Healthy: n = 54), Franzosa et al. (IBD: n = 164, Healthy: n = 56), and Yachida et al. (CRC: n = 150, Healthy: n = 127) were subjected to three machine learning algorithms, eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Feature selection identified microbial and metabolite biomarkers unique to each disease and shared across conditions. A microbial community (MICOM) model simulated gut microbial growth and metabolite fluxes, revealing metabolic differences between healthy and diseased states. Finally, network analysis uncovered metabolite clusters associated with disease traits.

resultsCombined machine learning models demonstrated strong predictive performance, with Random Forest achieving the highest Area Under the Curve(AUC) scores for GC(0.94[0.83-1.00]), CRC (0.75[0.62-0.86]), and IBD (0.93[0.86-0.98]). These models were then employed for cross-disease analysis, revealing that models trained on GC data successfully predicted IBD biomarkers, while CRC models predicted GC biomarkers with optimal performance scores.

conclusionThese findings emphasize the potential of microbial and metabolic profiling in cross-disease characterization particularly for GIDs, advancing biomarker discovery for improved diagnostics and targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal DiseasesInflammatory Bowel DiseasesStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkersGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMachine LearningMetabolomeBiomarkersBiomarkersColorectal cancerGastric cancerInflammatory bowel diseaseMachine learningMetabolomeMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID40380167
PMCPMC12085054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.