ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Deciphering microbial and metabolic influences in gastrointestinal diseases-unveiling their roles in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agentic artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel disease: toward autonomous and adaptive care.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- Generative AI-augmented transcriptomic and microbiome analysis across inflammatory and fibrotic disease states in Crohn's disease.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Integrated multi-omics profiling reveals phenotype- and tissue-specific host-microbiota interactions in paired tumor and peritumoral tissues of advanced gastric cancer patients from Northwest China.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of the microbiota in gingival crevicular fluid from peri-implantitis and periodontitis using 16 S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- CD74Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Neutrophils and NETs in Pathophysiology and Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Microbiota-host metabolism reprogramming in colorectal cancer: from pathogenesis to precision therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Identifying inflammatory bowel disease subtypes: a comprehensive exploration of transcriptomic data and machine learning-based approaches.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGastrointestinal disorders (GIDs) affect nearly 40% of the global population, with gut microbiome-metabolome interactions playing a crucial role in gastric cancer (GC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aims to investigate how microbial and metabolic alterations contribute to disease development and assess whether biomarkers identified in one disease could potentially be used to predict another, highlighting cross-disease applicability.
methodsMicrobiome and metabolome datasets from Erawijantari et al. (GC: n = 42, Healthy: n = 54), Franzosa et al. (IBD: n = 164, Healthy: n = 56), and Yachida et al. (CRC: n = 150, Healthy: n = 127) were subjected to three machine learning algorithms, eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Feature selection identified microbial and metabolite biomarkers unique to each disease and shared across conditions. A microbial community (MICOM) model simulated gut microbial growth and metabolite fluxes, revealing metabolic differences between healthy and diseased states. Finally, network analysis uncovered metabolite clusters associated with disease traits.
resultsCombined machine learning models demonstrated strong predictive performance, with Random Forest achieving the highest Area Under the Curve(AUC) scores for GC(0.94[0.83-1.00]), CRC (0.75[0.62-0.86]), and IBD (0.93[0.86-0.98]). These models were then employed for cross-disease analysis, revealing that models trained on GC data successfully predicted IBD biomarkers, while CRC models predicted GC biomarkers with optimal performance scores.
conclusionThese findings emphasize the potential of microbial and metabolic profiling in cross-disease characterization particularly for GIDs, advancing biomarker discovery for improved diagnostics and targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.