Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380121›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Deep learning health space model for ordered responses.

Chanhee Lee, Taesung Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chanhee LeeInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
Taesung ParkInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea. tspark@stats.snu.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1A2C1092497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs personalized medicine becomes more prevalent, the objective measurement and visualization of an individual's health status are becoming increasingly crucial. However, as the dimensions of data collected from each individual increase, this task becomes more challenging. The Health Space (HS) model provides a statistical framework for visualizing an individual's health status on biologically meaningful axes. In our previous study, we developed HS models using statistical models such as logistic regression model (LRM) and the proportional odds model (POM). However, these statistical HS models are limited in their ability to accommodate complex non-linear biological relationships.

methodsIn order to model complex non-linear biological relationship, we developed deep learning HS models. Specifically, we formulated five distinct deep learning HS models: four standard binary deep neural networks (DNNs) for binary outcomes and one deep ordinal neural network (DONN) that accounts for the ordinality of the dependent variable. We trained these models using 32,140 samples from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) and validated them with data from the Ewha-Boramae cohort (862 samples) and the Korea Association Resource (KARE) project (3,199 samples).

resultsThe proposed deep learning HS models were compared with the existing statistical HS model based on the POM. Deep learning HS model using DONN demonstrated the best performance in discriminating health status in both the training and external datasets.

conclusionWe developed deep learning HS models to capture complex non-linear biological relationships in HS and compared their performance with our previously best-performing statistical HS model. The deep learning HS models show promise as effective tools for objectively and meaningfully visualizing an individual's health status. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHealth StatusModels, StatisticalNeural Networks, ComputerAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRepublic of KoreaBiologically interpretable visualizationDeep ordinal neural networkHealth space model

Identifiers

PMID40380121
PMCPMC12084989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.