Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40380108›Full record

SynthesisBMC palliative care2025

Ethical, legal, and social aspects of health technologies for home-based paediatric palliative care - a systematic review.

Erik Bjørnerud, Simen A Steindal, Bjørn M Hofmann, Anette Winger, Kirsti Riiser, Weiqin Chen, Heidi Holmen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erik BjørnerudDepartment of Natural Sciences, Practical-Aesthetic, Social and Religious Studies, Faculty of Teacher Education and Languages, Østfold University College, Fredrikstad, Norway.
Simen A SteindalLovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn M HofmannDepartment of Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Anette WingerDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, 0130, Norway.
Kirsti RiiserDepartment of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, 0130, Norway.
Weiqin ChenDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Design, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, 0130, Norway.
Heidi HolmenDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, 0130, Norway. heidiho@oslomet.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome-based health technologies for paediatric palliative care have great potential to improve care for children, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and health systems. However, no systematic reviews have directly addressed the intersections among the ethical, legal, and social aspects of these technologies for paediatric palliative care. The objective of this systematic review was to identify and analyse the ethical, legal, and social aspects of health technologies for home-based paediatric palliative care.

methodsWe have conducted a systematic review, inspired by the framework suggested by McCullough. We registered the review protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024496034) and conducted a systematic search in six databases (ASSIA, Cinahl, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) on 27 November 2023 to identify relevant studies. Pairs of authors independently assessed the eligibility of the studies and extracted data. The eligible studies employed a range of different methods from randomised controlled trials to usability studies. We then synthesised the data according to the ethical, legal and social aspects of the technologies.

resultsOverall, our search resulted in 9,545 reports, which were screened after deduplication. The quality of the reports was assessed according to being published in peer reviewed journals. Fifteen reports were included, which showed that the main ethical issues are harm reduction, improved services, agency and autonomy, trust and empowerment. The main legal aspects are privacy equal access to care, participation in decisions and standardisation. The main social issues are cost reduction, transformation of family relations and novel modes of communication. Health technologies have the potential to alleviate burdens and improve the quality of care for children in paediatric palliative care and their families, but they also create novel burdens through constant reporting requirements and the vulnerability of some health technologies to technological malfunction. Nevertheless, they can increase family inclusion and children's autonomy and participation, thus empowering children, particularly through co-development of solutions. Furthermore, studies have indicated that health technologies themselves may have positive effects on children's health. The legal aspects of health technologies pertain to privacy and control over one's health information and equitable access to care and participation in care, while social issues can potentially reduce costs for health systems but also involve novel costs.

conclusionThe reviewed studies concerning the co-development of health technologies reported increased benefits in terms of health, agency, well-being, and strengthened children's rights in home-based paediatric palliative care. However, the social dimensions of such technologies can lead to both public savings and reconfiguration of family constellations. We recommend that future researchers consider privacy, the formal dimensions of apps and smartphones, and their impacts on families. PROSPERO REFERENCE: CRD42024496034.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyHome Care ServicesPalliative CarePediatricsChildHumansE-healthEthical, legal, and social aspectsHome-based health technologiesPaediatric palliative careSystematic reviewTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40380108
PMCPMC12082856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.