ArticleBMC public health2025
Social isolation in relation to the incidence and dynamic progression of frailty in the oldest old: a trajectory analysis of a nationwide cohort.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with sustained robustness in older adults: an 8-year multinational longitudinal study using SHARE data.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- Joint trajectories of physical frailty and social relationships and associated long-term care needs among Japanese community-dwelling older adults: a 6-year longitudinal study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is still a lack of evidence examining the association of behavioral and social factors with frailty transitions and mortality. We investigated whether social isolation is associated with different progressions and outcomes of frailty among community-dwelling older adults.
methodsThis community-based cohort study assessed the frailty index and objective social isolation of 31,168 participants (58.3% female; average age: 88.1 ± 11.1 years) from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) from 1998 to 2018. Four Markov state-transition models were constructed to examine the associations between social isolation and the seven transitions of the frailty trajectory.
resultsAccording to the Markov state-transition model, for every one-point increase in the social isolation score of non-frail participants, the risk of developing prefrailty increased by 4.2% [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.042, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.007-1.079], whereas for prefrail participants, the risk of developing frailty and death increased by 3.9% (HR = 1.039, 95% CI: 1.007-1.073) and 16.1% (HR = 1.161, 95% CI: 1.099-1.226), respectively. For each increase in the social isolation score in the frail population, the risk of death increased by 2.9% (HR = 1.029, 95% CI: 1.004-1.054). Socially isolated persons had a greater cumulative transition probability to prefrailty and frailty. Socially isolated women were more likely to experience prefrailty and frailty than socially isolated men, whereas the latter were more likely to die from prefrailty and frailty than the former.
conclusionsThis study indicates that social isolation may contribute to an increased risk of both the incidence and progression of frailty, elevating deterioration risks in initially non-frail and prefrail populations, while primarily exacerbating mortality risks in those already experiencing prefrailty or frailty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.